Is ON Semiconductor's Stock Overvalued? A Detailed Analysis
ON Semiconductor Corp (NASDAQ:ON), a leading supplier of power semiconductors and sensors, is currently experiencing a daily loss of -2.61%, with a 3-month gain of 4.08%. Despite its Earnings Per Share (EPS) standing at 4.37, questions have been raised regarding the company's valuation, with some speculating that the stock may be overvalued. ON Semiconductor, which focuses on the automotive and industrial markets, is the second-largest power chipmaker globally and the largest supplier of image sensors to the automotive market. The company is adopting a hybrid manufacturing strategy for flexible capacity and is shifting its focus to emerging applications like electric vehicles, autonomous vehicles, industrial automation, and renewable energy.
However, with a current stock price of $91.99 and a GF Value of $67.56, there appears to be a discrepancy between the stock's market price and its estimated fair value. The GF Value is a unique measure of a stock's intrinsic value, calculated based on historical multiples that the stock has traded at, a GuruFocus adjustment factor based on the company's past performance and growth, and future estimates of business performance. If the stock price is significantly above the GF Value Line, it is overvalued, and its future return is likely to be poor. Based on the GuruFocus Value calculation, ON Semiconductor appears to be significantly overvalued. With a current price of $91.99 per share and a market cap of $39.70 billion, the stock's future return is likely to be much lower than its future business growth due to its overvaluation. Despite the overvaluation, ON Semiconductor's financial strength is strong, with a cash-to-debt ratio of 0.75. The company has been profitable for 10 years over the past 10 years and had revenues of $8.40 billion and EPS of $4.37 during the past 12 months. Its operating margin of 32.66% is better than 94.43% of 952 companies in the Semiconductors industry. The average annual revenue growth of ON Semiconductor is 11.9%, which ranks worse than 50.8% of 872 companies in the Semiconductors industry. The 3-year average EBITDA growth is 40%, which ranks better than 72.52% of 775 companies in the Semiconductors industry. For the past 12 months, ON Semiconductor's return on invested capital is 28.94, and its cost of capital is 12.12, implying the company is creating value for shareholders. In conclusion, while ON Semiconductor's stock appears to be significantly overvalued, the company's financial condition is strong, and its profitability is robust. Its growth ranks better than 72.52% of 775 companies in the Semiconductors industry.
The 2026 Memory Super-Cycle: Navigating the 500% Surge in DRAM and NAND Flash PricesUTMEL17 June 20268083Driven by massive AI capital expenditures, the 2026 semiconductor market is experiencing a historic memory super-cycle, sending DRAM and NAND Flash prices soaring. With manufacturers prioritizing high-margin AI memory like HBM, severe shortages have spilled over to mature nodes, impacting automotive and IoT sectors. To navigate this volatility, procurement teams must secure long-term agreements, diversify suppliers, and optimize designs to mitigate rising BOM costs.
Read More
HBM4 and the Shift to Customized AI Memory: The Advanced Packaging BottleneckUTMEL22 June 20261466The JEDEC HBM4 standard transitions high-bandwidth memory to a customized architecture featuring a 2048-bit interface and logic base dies. While delivering extreme bandwidth for AI accelerators, its resource-intensive production triggers a global DRAM supply squeeze. Procurement teams must navigate rising prices, advanced packaging bottlenecks, and extended lead times by adopting strategic supply chain planning.
Read More
AI Computing Power Gap: How Token Consumption is Reshaping Server Component SourcingUTMEL23 June 2026468As global token consumption drives the transition to high-density 100kW+ AI data centers, power delivery networks require advanced Wide-Bandgap semiconductors (SiC/GaN) and high-capacitance MLCCs. This shift has triggered a component procurement crisis with lead times exceeding 24 weeks. To bypass shortages, hardware buyers must abandon just-in-time manufacturing and leverage independent global distributor networks to secure critical power and passive components.
Read More
Power Semiconductor Procurement After the Nexperia Shake-Up—NXP for Stability, ON for Technology, or Nexperia for Value?UTMEL04 November 20254565The recent supply chain turmoil surrounding Netherlands-based Nexperia has sent shockwaves through the global semiconductor industry, forcing procurement professionals to re-evaluate their sourcing strategies.
Read More
The BSPDN Revolution: Overcoming IR Drop in Sub-2nm GAAFET Nodes with Backside Power DeliveryUTMEL25 June 2026322As semiconductor manufacturing enters the sub-2nm era, Backside Power Delivery Networks (BSPDN) are replacing traditional front-side routing to overcome critical IR drop bottlenecks. By separating power and signal delivery, chipmakers like Intel and TSMC drastically improve performance and density in GAAFET designs. However, this radical shift introduces manufacturing complexities, thermal challenges, and demands advanced packaging and power management solutions.
Read More
Subscribe to Utmel !
H200X064H1T-2-BPanduit Corp
GRM31BR73A102KW01LMurata Electronics
LQG15HH27NH02DMurata Electronics
SLB-25MG3FROHM Semiconductor
PEC11R-4220F-S0024Bourns Inc.
BLM03AX121SZ1DMurata Electronics
101020057Seeed Technology Co., Ltd
ST2-DC24V-FPanasonic Electric Works
SR732ATTD6R80FKOA Speer Electronics, Inc.
EMK107BJ225KA-TTaiyo Yuden


Product
Brand
Articles
Tools










