LMR®-400 VS RG213[Video]: Pros and Cons of LMR400 VS RG213

UTMEL

Published: 07 March 2022 | Last Updated: 12 June 2024

14404

LMR-400

LMR-400

Amphenol Times Microwave Systems

COAXIAL CABLE, ANTENNA, RG8, 50 OHM, BCC

Purchase Guide

COAXIAL CABLE, ANTENNA, RG8, 50 OHM, BCC

Both RG213 and LMR400 are coaxial cables with a wide range of applications. Although there are many similarities between LMR400 and RG213, there are a few differences that distinguish them. These distinctions can make a major impact when it comes to determining which cable would work best for your electrical needs. This article is going to talk about the detailed information about LMR400 VS RG213, and interpret the differences between them.

This video demonstrates detailed information about LMR400 and RG213, and interpret the differences between them.

This vs That: LMR400 vs RG213

Overview of LMR400

The LMR®-400  from Times Microwave is built for versatility, low loss, RF shielding, and wearability. The cable design of the LMR-400  allows for the tightest bend radius of any cable of comparable size and performance. The cable has the least amount of loss of any similar cable. This cable has 90 dB of RF shielding and is suited for situations with a lot of EMI. The LMR-400  may be used both indoors and out. Use Times Microwave's LMR-400  cable for any application that requires an easily routed, low loss RF wire (e.g. WLLGPS, LMR, WLANWISP, WiMax, SCADA, Mobile Antennas). The LMR-400  is a direct replacement for the RG-8 cable.


Overview of RG213

A flexible RG213 coax cable with the part number RG213/U is from Pasternack. The RG213 flexible coax cable from Pasternack is 50 Ohm and features a PE dielectricRG213 coax has a PVC jacket with a thickness of 0.405. The shield count for RG213 coax is one, and the maximum frequency for this Pasternack cable is one GHz. At 1 GHz, the RG213 coax cable has a 9 dB attenuation and a maximum power of 190 watts.

Over 40,000 RF, microwave, and millimeter-wave components are made up of Pasternack RG213  coax cables. Same-day shipping of RG213 cables and other RF  parts is available worldwide. RF  cable assemblies made from RG213 or another coax can be constructed and dispatched the same day.


LMR400 VS RG213 Features

LMR400 Features

  • Priced Per Foot

  • Cable Type: LMR-400

  • Impedance: 50 ohm

  • Center Conductor: Bare Copper Covered Aluminum (BCCAI)

  • Jacket: Polyethylene (PE)

  • Outer Diameter: .405 inch

  • Indoor/Outdoor Rated

  • Drop-in replacement for RG-8

  • Attenuation @ 900 MHz/100 ft: 3.9dB/100ft

  • Attenuation @ 2.4 GHz/100 ft: 6.65dB/100ft

  • Any application (e.g. WLL, GPS, LMR, WLAN, WISP, WiMax, SCADA, Mobile Antennas) requiring an easily routed, low loss RF cable

  • Max Continuous Length: 1000 FT


RG213 Features

  • Impedance: 50 ohm

  • Capacitance: 98 pF/M

  • Center Conductor: Strand Bare Copper Wire

  • Shield Coverage: 96%

  • Minimum Bend Radius: 42mm




LMR400 VS RG213 Coaxial Cable Structure Figure

LMR400.jpg

LMR400 Chart.jpg

LMR400 Structure Figure

RG213.jpg

RG213 Chart.jpg

 RG213 Structure Figure


LMR400 VS RG213 Frequency

FrequencyRG213 Loss (Attenuation dB/100ft)LMR400 Loss (Attenuation dB/100ft)
100 MHz2.21.2
400 MHz4.82.5
1000 MHz8.24.1


LMR400 VS RG213 Electrical Characteristics


LMR400RG213
Min. Temperature Rating-40°C-40°C
Max. Temperature Rating75°C85°C
Max. Voltage5,0002,500
Impedance (ohms)5050
Capacitance (pF/ft)32.223.9
Max. Freq. (GHz)116


LMR400 VS RG213 Specifications

Generic NameRG213LMR-400
Flex TypeFlexibleFlexible
Impedance50 Ohm50 Ohm
Dielectric TypePEPE (F)
Velocity of Propagation66%85%
Jacket Diameter0.405 in0.405 in
Jacket MaterialPVCPE
No. of Shields12
Attenuation at 1 Ghz.9 dB4.25 dB
Power, Max at 1 Ghz.190 Watts90 dB
Frequency, Max1 GHz6 GHz
Max Operating Temperature70 deg C85 deg C
Center Conductor TypeStrandedSolid
Inner Conductor, Number of Strands71
Minimum Bend Radius, Repeated1.6 in1 in
Coax TypeCoaxCoax


Conclusion of LMR400 VS RG213 Specifications

For high-end radio frequency antennasLMR400  versus RG213  are two excellent coaxial cables. Although the two cables are quite similar in size, they are constructed differently. The key difference between the two is that the RG213  coaxial cable is less expensive and has a stranded bare copper center conductor. The LMR400  coax cable, on the other hand, contains a solid bare copper wrapped aluminum conductor. The RG213  coaxial cable also has a PVC jacket, unlike the LMR400  coaxial wire, which has a PE jacket,  These two outer jackets, on the other hand, are intriguing. 

Polyvinyl chloride is commonly used in domestic applications such as pipes, garden hoses, waterbeds, and vinyl raincoats  (PVC). Because of its qualities and versatilitypolyethylene is utilized in bulletproof vests and a range of other high-temperature products. As a result, because the LMR400  's outer jacket is made of polyethylene, it wins in terms of cable protection. The shielding conductor of these cables is another important distinction between LMR400  and RG213  coaxial cable s. The RG213  features a single bare copper braid shield, but the LMR400  has two shields, one constructed of aluminum braid and the other of braided tinned copper. LMR400  is the winner once more.


LMR400 VS RG213 Applications

LMR400 Applications

  • Wireless communication systems

  • Drop-in replacement for RG8/9913 air-dielectric type cable

  • Short antenna

  • Feeder runs

  • Easily-routed, low loss RF cable.

 

RG213 Applications

  • Telecommunications

  • Radio communications

  • Broadcast

  • Computer applications


Conclusion of LMR400 VS RG213

The RG213 shield is made up of a single bare copper braid, whereas the LMR400 shield is made up of an aluminum braid and a braided tinned copper braid. These cables differ mostly in terms of maximum voltage rating, capacitance, and maximum frequency when it comes to electrical specs.

Signal loss is caused by a variety of sources, but in this case, the conductors are to blame for the attenuation variances. The lower the attenuation, the greater the conductor is. Due to the fact that LMR400  has a larger conductor than RG213, RG213 suffers from a higher signal loss than LMR400.

The RG213 coax cable is utilized in a wide range of military and commercial applications, including radio communications, high-performance electrical and data transmission, broadcast, and computer applications, to name a few. When low signal loss and high operating voltages are necessary, it can also be utilized as an antenna feed cable. It also performs well in heat-sensitive situations, with a maximum temperature rating of 75°Celsius. The M17/74-RG213 is the military's version of the M17/74-RG213.

LMR400 is designed as a drop-in replacement for RG8  /9913 air-dielectric type cable and short antenna, feeder runs in wireless communication systems. It's also appropriate for applications that demand a low-loss, conveniently routed RF  connection.


LMR400 Manufacturer

Times Microwave Systems is a pioneer in the development and manufacture of coaxial transmission lines. For military, aerospace, wireless communications, and industrial applications, they offer a wide range of RF and microwave transmission line solutions. In the industry, its engineering competence and range of manufacturing capabilities are well acknowledged. They can serve both specialist applications with extremely demanding performance requirements and high volume commercial applications at frequencies ranging from a few kHz to 110 GHz, thanks to production sites in the United States and China. Since 2009, Times Microwave Systems has had access to the resources of Amphenol, one of the world's largest makers of interconnect components. Amphenol Corporation is a manufacturer of electrical, electronic, and fiber-optic connectors, as well as connection systems and coaxial and specialized cable.


Note: LMR® is a registered trademark of Times Microwave Systems.


Related Article

If you want to learn more information about LMR400, you can see the article about LMR400 VS RG58.

Datasheet PDF

Download datasheets and manufacturer documentation for Amphenol Times Microwave Systems LMR-400.

Popularity by Region

Parts with Similar Specs

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better LMR400 or RG213?

The RG213 is rated at 5000 volts, which is twice the voltage of the LMR400, which is rated for 2500 volts. LMR400 coax cables, on the other hand, outperform RG213 in terms of both loss and power handling.

Is LMR400 the same as rg8?

LMR-400 was designed to replace low-quality RG-8 wires because it offers greater flexibility, a simpler connection, and the lowest signal loss. In general, the LMR-400 can be utilized in any application where low signal loss is required.

What is RG213 cable used for?

The coaxial cables RG214 and RG213 are used to transmit high-frequency signals. These coax cables are suitable for telecommunications, radio communications, broadcast, and computer applications.

Is RG213 coax good?

At 400 MHz and higher, RG-213 has a large loss of 7.2 dB at 100 feet. If these stations are just used for monitoring, RG-6 at 75 ohms will suffice, as it has a loss of 5.9 dB at 1 GHz per 100 feet of cable. LMR 600 or LMR1200 are good options for transmitting on frequencies above 100 MHz.

Is LMR-400 good coax?

LMR-400 is the best and lowest-loss coax out there. For UHF, there's no other sensible choice. The higher the frequency, the greater the loss in coaxial cable. 

Is LMR400 the same as rg8?

LMR-400 was designed to replace low-quality RG-8 wires because it offers greater flexibility, a simpler connection, and the lowest signal loss. In general, the LMR-400 can be utilized in any application where low signal loss is required.
LMR-400

Amphenol Times Microwave Systems

In Stock

United States

China

Canada

Japan

Russia

Germany

United Kingdom

Singapore

Italy

Hong Kong(China)

Taiwan(China)

France

Korea

Mexico

Netherlands

Malaysia

Austria

Spain

Switzerland

Poland

Thailand

Vietnam

India

United Arab Emirates

Afghanistan

Åland Islands

Albania

Algeria

American Samoa

Andorra

Angola

Anguilla

Antigua & Barbuda

Argentina

Armenia

Aruba

Australia

Azerbaijan

Bahamas

Bahrain

Bangladesh

Barbados

Belarus

Belgium

Belize

Benin

Bermuda

Bhutan

Bolivia

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba

Bosnia & Herzegovina

Botswana

Brazil

British Indian Ocean Territory

British Virgin Islands

Brunei

Bulgaria

Burkina Faso

Burundi

Cabo Verde

Cambodia

Cameroon

Cayman Islands

Central African Republic

Chad

Chile

Christmas Island

Cocos (Keeling) Islands

Colombia

Comoros

Congo

Congo (DRC)

Cook Islands

Costa Rica

Côte d’Ivoire

Croatia

Cuba

Curaçao

Cyprus

Czechia

Denmark

Djibouti

Dominica

Dominican Republic

Ecuador

Egypt

El Salvador

Equatorial Guinea

Eritrea

Estonia

Eswatini

Ethiopia

Falkland Islands

Faroe Islands

Fiji

Finland

French Guiana

French Polynesia

Gabon

Gambia

Georgia

Ghana

Gibraltar

Greece

Greenland

Grenada

Guadeloupe

Guam

Guatemala

Guernsey

Guinea

Guinea-Bissau

Guyana

Haiti

Honduras

Hungary

Iceland

Indonesia

Iran

Iraq

Ireland

Isle of Man

Israel

Jamaica

Jersey

Jordan

Kazakhstan

Kenya

Kiribati

Kosovo

Kuwait

Kyrgyzstan

Laos

Latvia

Lebanon

Lesotho

Liberia

Libya

Liechtenstein

Lithuania

Luxembourg

Macao(China)

Madagascar

Malawi

Maldives

Mali

Malta

Marshall Islands

Martinique

Mauritania

Mauritius

Mayotte

Micronesia

Moldova

Monaco

Mongolia

Montenegro

Montserrat

Morocco

Mozambique

Myanmar

Namibia

Nauru

Nepal

New Caledonia

New Zealand

Nicaragua

Niger

Nigeria

Niue

Norfolk Island

North Korea

North Macedonia

Northern Mariana Islands

Norway

Oman

Pakistan

Palau

Palestinian Authority

Panama

Papua New Guinea

Paraguay

Peru

Philippines

Pitcairn Islands

Portugal

Puerto Rico

Qatar

Réunion

Romania

Rwanda

Samoa

San Marino

São Tomé & Príncipe

Saudi Arabia

Senegal

Serbia

Seychelles

Sierra Leone

Sint Maarten

Slovakia

Slovenia

Solomon Islands

Somalia

South Africa

South Sudan

Sri Lanka

St Helena, Ascension, Tristan da Cunha

St. Barthélemy

St. Kitts & Nevis

St. Lucia

St. Martin

St. Pierre & Miquelon

St. Vincent & Grenadines

Sudan

Suriname

Svalbard & Jan Mayen

Sweden

Syria

Tajikistan

Tanzania

Timor-Leste

Togo

Tokelau

Tonga

Trinidad & Tobago

Tunisia

Turkey

Turkmenistan

Turks & Caicos Islands

Tuvalu

U.S. Outlying Islands

U.S. Virgin Islands

Uganda

Ukraine

Uruguay

Uzbekistan

Vanuatu

Vatican City

Venezuela

Wallis & Futuna

Yemen

Zambia

Zimbabwe

Related Parts More